There's no single number, because "smart home" covers everything from a lighting-only starting point to a full-estate build unifying audio, video, climate, shades, and security. What actually drives cost is scope, not brand — here's how we break it down so the range means something.
Lighting control alone costs far less than lighting plus AV, climate, shades, and security unified on one platform.
Wiring during new construction or a major remodel is more efficient and less invasive than retrofitting into finished walls.
More rooms, more lighting zones, and more AV areas scale the equipment and programming cost proportionally.
We start every project with an ACT Blueprint™ — a documented plan and firm proposal before a single wire is run, so cost is known up front rather than discovered mid-project.
Generally yes — running wiring before walls are closed is far more efficient than retrofitting, though wireless and low-impact retrofit options exist for existing homes.
Yes, when planned that way from the start — we design the network and control backbone to support future phases so early work isn't wasted.
It often costs less in the long run — one integrated system avoids the redundant hubs, apps, and duplicate equipment that come with piecing systems together separately.
Through an ACT Blueprint™ walkthrough of the property and a conversation about priorities, resulting in a documented, firm proposal rather than a rough estimate.
See the full Smart Homes service, or read the Smart Home Planning Guide for how a project comes together room by room.
Explore Smart Homes
